Where you are Home » News » General News » PLANNERS ADVISED TO PARTNER PROFESSIONAL BODIES …IN DEVELOPING LIVABLE HUMAN SETTLEMENT
PLANNERS ADVISED TO PARTNER PROFESSIONAL BODIES …IN DEVELOPING LIVABLE HUMAN SETTLEMENT
Date :26th Apr, 2012
The Minister for Environmental, science, and Technology Madam Sherry Ayittey has advised the Institute of planners and the Association of planners to collaborate with other professional bodies involved in the development of the built environment to ensure concerns in the development of livable human settlements is met.According to her these bodies should work hard to deal with today’s challenges so the upcoming generations could look at the future with confidence.
Madam Ayittey made this statement at a West African Regional Conference of the Commonwealth Association of Planners held in Accra.
She said unplanned, haphazard, uncontrolled and non-conforming development is a major problem in the country adding that landowners engage planners, surveyors or unqualified persons to prepare subdivision plans for areas not convered by structure plans or planning schemes.
“they survey the land and sell plots, and people proceed to build houses without roads, water , electricity, waste management service, sullage drains and other community services and facilities” she added.
She pointed out that planners are often blamed for the unplanned and haphazard development which appears that chief decision-makers and the general public are not aware of the serious problem that affect the functions of the Town and Country Planning Department.
She again advised that as professionals in the development of built environment there is a need to build on a sustainable and innovative principle to meet the great challenges of time.
The Mayor of Accra Hon. Alfred Okoe Vanderpuije who was the chairman of the programme also stated on the theme ‘Regional Integration for Regional Planning’ adding that it aid to encourage participant to work hard to build finest cities for themselves.
He said West Africa Planners should challenge with the need to develop to change their environment. “we must make conditions better for various cities”.
He then shown appreciation to the institute of Planners and urged all to stand firm and plan properly together with the city authorities.




Carol wrote :
You can send your maps and financial exrceise (along with any other comments, of course), to: Moving Transit Forward, Attn: MS 141, 707 North First Street, St. Louis, MO 63102. We'd like to receive all input for this initial round by the end of next week if possible. Thanks!
reply Carol 's commentjybhxdwlvfd wrote :
UeHPf3 uozvvejgvnse
reply jybhxdwlvfd 's commentDaveigh wrote :
Who writes the words on some of the answer choices? Have they ever ridden public transit in their life? More on that in a minute.First, it seems like Metrolink and Metrobus are being treated as two parts. They arent regarded as a “system”. In nearly all the questions regarding expansion and “what metro should do next” — it is a one or the other proposition. Along those lines, it seemed that every time you had a choice of metrolink or bus, the metroLINK answer was very short, while the metroBUS answer was more detailed.Example:Expand MetroLink service to new parts of St. Louis countyorImprove MetroBus service, which would include modern buses at safe, well-lit stops, that arrived more frequently and offered more express routesThese choices (intended or not) almost seem to imply that if the bus option is chosen, it will be safety first with frequent and fast service. Or you can pick the train – which by implication may be none of the above.Then there is this piece of a question regarding which way would be better to improve public transit:“expand MetroLink which may take longer to accomplish and be more expensive, or expand MetroBus, which may be achieved more quickly and be cheaper?”If the only two variables you look at in expanding public transit are time to get the expansion completed and cost to implement it, the train will rarely – if ever – win. Expanding public transit is a far more complex question than this, IMO. Its almost as if the poll want you to choose bus or train, but you cant have both. Why does it have to be ‘train OR bus’. Why cant it be train AND bus? Any expansion of metrolink would obviously mean adjusting some bus routes, and perhaps adding more. The train works best when the bus network feeds (and gets fed) by it…as part of a system.Then there is the tax question. As a city resident, I cant vote on it — no blood no foul there, but how is THIS for an answer as to what argument would convince you to vote for the tax“A larger public transportation system than the one now in operation would get more cars off the road and make it easier for my own commute in a car”What? Really? A reason to expand public transit is so I can drive more freely?Gah! online auto insurance auto insurance rates
reply Daveigh 's commentRocky wrote :
Took the poll. It seems geared towards county residents, given some of the questions. Also seems skewed to the side of more bus service of some sort vice trains. Maybe thats just my perception. Some of the responses I thought were a little _too_ cut and dried. I understand that they are trying to take a poll and tally results, but there were a couple questions I would have gladly commented on and couldnt. tramadol state auto insurance
reply Rocky 's commentDavion wrote :
You can send your maps and financial exercise (along with any other comments, of course), to: Moving Transit Forward, Attn: MS 141, 707 North First Street, St. Louis, MO 63102. We’d like to receive all input for this initial round by the end of next week if possible. Thanks! insurance quotes buy auto insurance online
reply Davion 's commentJaylon wrote :
You can send your maps and financial exercise (along with any other comments, of course), to: Moving Transit Forward, Attn: MS 141, 707 North First Street, St. Louis, MO 63102. We’d like to receive all input for this initial round by the end of next week if possible. Thanks! tramadol insurance quotes
reply Jaylon 's commentLissa wrote :
ÐÑÑавÑÑе Ñвой комменÑаÑий ÐÑ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑе иÑполÑзоваÑÑ ÑледÑÑÑие HTML ÑÑги: <a> <abbr> <acronym> <b> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <del> <em> <i> <q> <strike> <strong> var RecaptchaOptions = { theme : 'clean', lang : 'en' , tabindex : 5 }; #submit {display:none;} tramadol insurance quotes
reply Lissa 's commentBobbie wrote :
ÐÑÑавÑÑе Ñвой комменÑаÑий ÐÑ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑе иÑполÑзоваÑÑ ÑледÑÑÑие HTML ÑÑги: <a> <abbr> <acronym> <b> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <del> <em> <i> <pre> <q> <strike> <strong> /* */ buy car insurance online life insurance rate
reply Bobbie 's commentbags wrote :
It is hard to find knowledgeable people on this topic, but you sound like you know what you?e talking about! Thanks bags
reply bags 's commentMorrie wrote :
Conferences – scan a genealogy conference attendee’s badge and learn the surnames they are researching; professional genealogists could advertise their areas of expertise on a QR code sort of like a business card or an advertisement; or even let attendees speed through registration at an event! auto insurance online life insurance comparison
reply Morrie 's comment